the corporate income tax
ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, former U. S. senator
2010 -- The United States Senate by a vote of 85-13 has without debate adopted
a sense of the Senate resolution against a value added tax.
and articles against a VAT by The Wall Street Journal, Cato Institute
and the Heritage Foundation no doubt prompted Senator John McCain to put
the Senate on record against a VAT. Mention the word "tax" in
Congress and both parties become a party of "no." But the resolution
was presented under false pretenses. It was presented not in replacement
of any tax, but as an additional burden to the "enormous burden of
the federal income tax" - described as a "2000 page complex,
antiquated, oversized, tax code that wreaks havoc" and "requires
over $100 billion in compliance costs." Senator McCain, by inference,
attaches this description to the VAT. Apparently, the Senate is set to
do nothing this year to stop off-shoring of production and jobs - to do
nothing about deficits in excess of $1 trillion for as far as the eye
can see. The Senate waits until President Obama's budget study commission
reports sometime next year. We don't have the luxury of waiting a year.
This is where I agree with Senator McCain. Now is the time to talk taxes.
I have been recommending for the past year abolishing the corporate income
tax to be replaced by a 5% VAT -- 2% to replace the corporate income tax;
1% to pay for health care reform; and 2% to pay down deficits. Having
served in the U. S. Senate thirty-eight years and on its Budget Committee
over thirty years, I know this is realistic and doable by Congress.
for education or skills, poor little South Carolina with 12.2% unemployment
is producing BMW's "ultimate driving machine" and Boeing's
Dreamliner. Tom Friedman is always looking for a silver bullet in
advanced technology to restore the economy. Silver bullets Microsoft
and Intel have left for China. The advanced technology program that
we instituted twenty years ago to develop silver bullet technologies
in the United States was abolished by President George W. Bush.
It doesn't pay to develop advanced technology in the United States.
In fact, it's difficult to produce for a profit. That's a hell of
a statement to make -- but necessary."
Ernest F. Hollings
Business Week stated: "If the nation turns too quickly to
deficit reduction, the economy could get stuck in a rut that would be
expensive to escape." The economy is already in a rut "expensive
to escape." We gave President George W. Bush "surpluses as far
as the eye could see." He cut taxes, causing a debt or rut of $5
trillion, and now President Obama deepens the rut with a budget calling
for trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see. (President's 2011
Budget, page 178). President Obama has our country on automatic pilot,
borrowing, spending, and off-shoring our economy as fast as he can. This
has got to stop.
Globalization is nothing more than a trade war with production looking
for a country cheaper to produce. Every nation is fighting fiercely to
build its economic strength while America finesses trade laws that would
protect our economy. Under Section 201 of the Trade Act, we didn't have
to wait for GM to go bankrupt, but we should have moved years ago when
its production was being endangered by subsidized imports. With the dollar
devalued and devastating deficits in the balance of trade, President Obama
should impose a 10% surcharge on imports like President Nixon did in 1971.
Our defenses are down. We don't have the equipment and materiel. Under
the War Production Act of 1950, President Obama should long ago have imposed
tariffs or quotas on imports ensuring domestic production and a ready
supply of materiel necessary for our nation's security. But President
Obama, lacking experience, espouses the same nonsense of previous presidents:
"Free trade," "protectionism," "more education,
As for education or skills, poor little South Carolina with 12.2% unemployment
is producing BMW's "ultimate driving machine" and Boeing's Dreamliner.
Tom Friedman is always looking for a silver bullet in advanced technology
to restore the economy. Silver bullets Microsoft and Intel have left for
China. The advanced technology program that we instituted twenty years
ago to develop silver bullet technologies in the United States was abolished
by President George W. Bush. It doesn't pay to develop advanced technology
in the United States. In fact, it's difficult to produce for a profit.
That's a hell of a statement to make -- but necessary.
Washington, responding to pollster politics, keeps calling for jobs, jobs.
But "it's the economy stupid." Its investment, research, technology,
development, production, jobs, and the economy that's being off-shored.
Rather than caterwauling for H1-B visas, Microsoft and GM off-shore research
to China. Intel develops and produces chips in China. And like the Ford
Foundation, Intel makes multi-million dollar grants to communities in
China. We're not only losing the economy, but middle-class jobs and community
development. An entrepreneur who made wonderful contributions to the College
of Charleston has moved his production to Vietnam, lives in Vietnam, and,
thankfully, still supports the College. We're losing our leadership as
the nation stays buried in pollster politics.
The pollster politics of being against taxes now meets its Waterloo in
the House Budget Committee. It can't report a budget. No one can defend
the President's budget of deficits exceeding a trillion dollars for as
far as the eye can see. We elect people to solve the nation's problems,
not appoint study commissions. The President and Congress must act now
to stop the borrowing and spending and off-shoring our economy -- and
make it profitable to produce once again in the United States.
Unless someone has a better idea, we should eliminate the corporate income
tax and replace it with a 2% VAT. That raises more revenues. Now we've
cut taxes and have more money. This is a politician's dream. Then add
a 1% VAT to pay for health reform and a 2% VAT to pay down deficits. To
the cries of "regressive, regressive" include exemptions for
food, health and housing for the poor. TV has just reported that 47% of
households paid no income tax last week; and multi-nationals like GE paid
zero. Small business corporations have been paying the corporate income
tax. I asked a small business corporate owner if he would like to replace
his income tax with a 5% sales tax. He said, "I can take that in
a New York minute." Finally, if they want to blab politically about
taxing the middle-class, remember a VAT is on consumption, not income.
The more you consume, the more you pay. And canceling the corporate income
tax, which averages 27%, reduces production's profit 27%, which reduces
the cost to all consumers. The 5% VAT is a winner for the poor, the middle-class,
and the rich, and it is absolutely necessary in the trade war. One hundred
thirty-two countries engage in the trade war with a VAT that's rebateable
on exports. Producing in the United States for delivery in China, there's
an average payment of 27% corporate income tax, with a 17% VAT added when
it arrives in Hong Kong, for a total of 44%. But producing the same article
in China for delivery in the United States, the 17% VAT is rebated when
it leaves Hong Kong; arriving in the United States, no income tax, for
44% less cost. Corporate America's profits from production in China are
not subject to the corporate income tax unless repatriated. So by canceling
the corporate income tax outright you've given the same advantage to production
in the United States that you have been giving Corporate America to produce
in China. Now Congress has started rebuilding our economy and paying down
Now the Budget Committee and Congress can pass a budget. But vote! Those
filibustering or voting against this proposal will be voting against cutting
taxes, against relieving Corporate America of income taxes; to continue
"the highest business tax" and making sure that you can't produce
for a profit in the United States; against promoting exports by 32%; against
paying for health care; against paying down the debt; against stemming
the flow of off-shore jobs; voting again middle-class jobs and saving
the economy of the United States, and against cutting taxes and continuing
to borrow and spend. Let's vote!
of South Carolina served 38 years in the United States Senate, and for
many years was Chairman of the Commerce, Space, Science & Transportation
Committee. He is the author of the recently published book,
Government Work (University of South Carolina Press, 2008).
Ernest F. Hollings. All rights reserved. Contact
us for republication permission.
Ernest F. Hollings served
the public for 56 years -- 38 years in the United States Senate and as South
Carolina's governor, lieutenant governor and a member of the S.C. House of
Today, Hollings continues
to be influential in public affairs and offers this Web site as a compendium
of current and past positions on public issues. Learn
more about Fritz Hollings.
Hollings receives French honor
France honored retired
U.S. Sen. Fritz Hollings on in 2013 by awarding him the Legion of Honor for
his World War II service. More.
commentary via The Huffington Post
Please visit Sen.
Hollings' section of The Huffington Post where you can get an RSS of his
columns, subscribe by email or use social media.
here to learn more about Hollings' impressive and distinguished record
of public service.
the new book
University of South Carolina Press in 2008 published Making
Government Work, a new book by Sen. Hollings. Learn